|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
General News Clarion councilman believes proposed funding will help borough
CLARION - “We left feeling that the local government
committee has its thumb on the problem and that they have a way in hand to
resolve it,” Clarion Borough Councilman Rich Herman of proposed legislation
that would provide state reimbursement to communities with high rates of
non-taxable properties. State Rep. Bob Freeman (D-Northampton) has introduced a
bill that would provide payments to municipalities with more than a 17
percentage of real estate tax-exempt properties. Freeman conducted a series of public hearings across the
state to gather information about the issue and one of those hearings was last
month in Herman and Clarion Borough Manager Nancy Freenock recently
provided testimony on the issue before the local government committee headed by
Freeman. “Why are we so strong in our support of House Bill 2018
you ask? – The answer is simple. In Clarion we have built the “perfect
storm” of tax exempt properties to the tune of 70.7 percent,” Herman
testified. “That’s right- 70.7 percent of our total assessed property value
is tax exempt. And we feel this presents an unfair tax burden on Clarion Borough
taxpayers that must be addressed.” Herman said “But their move to Monroe Township signaled the beginning
of the expansion of the township and the Interstate 80 corridor at exit 62, that
continues today,” said Herman. “Since 1980 the According to the latest information obtained from the
Clarion County Real Property Tax Summary, the Borough of Clarion has
$107,018,911 in total assessed property value. Of that, $75,658,177 is tax
exempt. Meaning that 70.7 percent of the assessed property value in the Borough
of Clarion is not taxable. “These figures are nothing new to the borough or its
taxpayers. In 1990 the percentage of non-taxable properties was at 69.8 percent,
reached a high of 71.1 percent in 1995 and currently sits at 70.7 percent,”
said Herman. “In 2007 Clarion Borough received $16,247 on payments in lieu of
taxes. Even considering these arrangements, Clarion Borough would be at 70
percent non-taxable assessed property.” Herman said the non-taxable property problem crosses the
state and is not just limited to Clarion Borough. Herman said while he and his fellow council members support
the expansion of CUP as a strong part of the local economy, the problem of
CUP’s non-taxable status is a state problem. “But CUP’s growth shouldn’t come at the expense of
the residents of Clarion Borough. I understand that,” said Herman. “I’m
committed to finding a way to lower property taxes for the residents of Clarion
Borough. “Clarion Borough offers its residents a lot of quality
services and we have to pay for those services, but those services also benefit
the non-taxable properties as well.” Herman said he favors the way Freeman’s proposal
approaches the problem. Freeman’s
legislation would create the Tax-Exempt Property Municipal Assistance Fund,
which would be funded by dedicating revenue generated by the 18 percent The Johnstown
Flood Tax, enacted by the state legislature in 1936 to provide financial relief
to victims of flooding in Passage of the legislation could mean as much as $574,000
per year for Clarion, based on the proposed formula in the bill. The funding
formula within the legislation is based on the assessed value of those
properties if they were taxable. No single
municipality would receive more than 10 percent of the total revenue in the
fund, and property owned by the municipality itself would not be eligible. Herman said there
is now only way for the borough to cover increasing costs. “There’s
only one way to cover those costs and that is increased property taxes,”
Herman told the committee. “Clarion Borough enjoyed a reputation of not
raising property taxes for many years. From 1994 to 2002 we had no property tax
increase. But having so much tax exempt property has finally caught up with us.
In the last three years Clarion Borough had to raise taxes eight mills, and
those increases were simply to pay the bills. In other words, we passed a bare
bones budget leaving only a small contingency fund.” Herman told the Clarion
News, “This solution would cross all the lines. It’s not just for
places with State System of Higher Education schools. It’s a totality bill.” Herman said he also likes the proposal because it doesn’t
pit the community against the university. “We should be able to do this working side by side,”
said Herman. The bill is making its way the legislative process.
|
| |||||||||||||||||||