|
|||||||||
|
General News Group looks to capitalize on Clarion River’s wild and scenic designation
CLARION - The Now municipalities along the river have joined in a
partnership with state and federal agencies to decide what that will mean. The Clarion River Municipal Partnership headed by Eric
Patton, a The group is developing a management plan for the river
based on a “tripod” of three objectives: river health, economic opportunity
and cultural heritage, Patton said. The forest service, in charge of the Wild and Scenic
program in this case, set up a recent meeting at the Holiday Inn and found there
more interest than anticipated. Similar meetings were held in Ridgway Nov. 5 and
Sigel Nov. 6. The meeting room chosen is large enough for a couple dozen
people, but when more than 60 showed up, the meeting was moved to the Some citizens expressed interest in protecting the river,
some were concerned about private property rights, others about the economic
opportunities related to tourism. Patton emphasized that the river designations are not
intended to lock up the river valley as a wilderness where people are restricted
from using and interacting with the environment. The idea is to protect the
river, but only in a way that benefits the public with recreational, educational
end economic opportunities, he said. The river corridor To be designated in the wild and scenic program, a river
must be free flowing (no dams) and show at least one “outstandingly remarkable
value,” Patton said, and the Clarion has three: geologic, scenic and
recreational. The narrow, steep-sided and winding river valley is a
remarkable geologic characteristic, and this leads to a remarkable scenic
characteristic, and its suitability for easy canoeing through publicly owned
state parks, state forests and game lands makes for remarkable recreational
opportunities. Much of the river in the WSR system is bordered by
publicly-owned land, including the The management corridor currently extends a quarter-mile
from the river’s average high-water mark on both sides, and can contain up to
320 acres per linear quarter-mile. However, the corridor boundaries can be re-evaluated and
changed: if a private landowner insists on not participating, that land can be
excluded down to the high water mark. The Clarion is a navigable waterway and the water course
and the banks to the high water mark are essentially owned by the The river is managed by the Army Corps of Engineers which
has delegated management of the point between the usual low water mark and the
high-water mark to the U.S. Forest Service. This means any project affecting the
river’s edge must be approved by the Forest Service. Solving problems Patton said his township had problems along the river: a
narrow roadway was often clogged with parked vehicles. Uncontrolled camping
caused damage and disturbance. He praised the efforts of the Forest Service to set up and
control parking and camping areas. Now the permanent residents of his township
are happier and the tourists are happier as well, as there are fewer conflicts
and problems. “A management plan, if we can influence it, can be a
positive thing,” Patton said. Another problem Patton sees in his township’s stretch of
the river involves differing use rules. Camping is allowed on the north side of the river, which is
Still other riverside land is state forest, where camping
is again allowed. The Game Commission is not a member of the partnership, and
while Patton would like to see it join, he doubts it could easily drop its
camping prohibition in any case. Patton said the partnership may set standards for control
of the use of the river, but will base those decisions on conditions rather than
numbers. He explained that some management plans are based on the
number of people using a resource, with regulations going into effect when a
numerical limit is exceeded. The CRMP will more likely use a standards-based system,
with regulations adopted only when actual problems become evident. For example, restrictions on camping would be put into
place only when a particular campsite begins showing excessive environmental
damage, and not because a certain number of users is exceeded. Public vs. private Clarion County Commissioner Dave Cyphert said he was
concerned that a permit system would be established which would limit who would
be allowed to use the river. He said this could lead to a landowner along the river
being prevented from accessing the waterway from his or her own land. He said
the county “must take the position of the landowner” and argue for property
rights. He also noted that the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy has
purchased private land and “given it to the government,” thereby limiting
use by citizens. Patton said he shared Cyphert’s concern and that a permit
system would be “absolutely a last resort.” Overly heavy use should not
trigger restrictions on use, Patton said, but instead should lead to an
expansion of facilities. Former Clarion County Judge Charles Alexander said it was
okay for the government to manage public land, but private land can only be
regulated by local zoning. Alexander owns tracts of land along the scenic section of
the river in Patton said he understands property ownership concerns and
agrees that the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy’s policy of buying private
land then selling it to the government has affected the community in a negative
way. The CRMP’s intent is to maintain the river as it was when
designated, and has no intent to buy private land and restrict its use. If a
landowner wishes to sell, that’s one thing, but the government should not
actively seek to purchase and control private land. The CRMP will develop property acquisition guidelines and
wants the public to have input into those guidelines, Patton said. Since inclusion in the Wild and If private landowners include themselves in the corridor,
they can influence river management plans, and the CRMP wants to work toward
consensus, Patton said. Protecting scenery Area resident Mike Butler, who worked toward the wild and
scenic designation in the early 1990s, stressed the protection of the scenic
portion of the river between A century ago, heavy timbering blighted and denuded the
river valley in this section, he noted, but it has recovered and became a scenic
treasure to be protected. A business in Clarion Borough will open soon, he said, and
will depend on tourism for a good part of its business, and the scenic section
of river will be a major draw. The management plan for the scenic section should provide
for access, but should be more protective than the recreational sections of the
river, such as through “I want people to recognize the qualities of the river
and protect it for their children and grandchildren,” Patton said different people want different things for the
river, and a comprehensive planning effort will determine “where to do
what.” Management decisions should consider that the scenic sections will draw
a different kind of visitor seeking a different kind of experience than the
recreational sections. Open for input Patton said the idea is to reach a balance between private
property rights and public use and between access and protection, and there will
be more opportunities for public input and involvement in the planning process. There will be more public meetings, he assured the crowd,
but also noted that the management plan “is on a fast track compared to
normal.” The CRMP hopes to move to the next planning stage by early
next year, when more extensive discussions with local governments will take
place. He urged the crowd to stay involved and to contact the CRMP
and the Forest Service with ideas and concerns. The Forest Service can be contacted through Deputy District
Ranger Jodie Vanselow, The Clarion River Municipal Partnership can be contacted in
care of Eric Patton,
Hosting by USAChoice. |
|
|||||||